Castro v. State
939 So. 2d 1112, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16635, 2006 WL 2741502
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Castro v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 914 So. 2d 467 →
Opinion
Enrique Castro filed a motion for post-conviction relief, claiming that there are transcription errors in the transcript of his plea colloquy. The trial court summarily denied the motion and Castro has appealed. We vacate the order and remand for further consideration in light of this court’s related reversal in Castro v. State, 935 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Castro v. State, 939 So. 2d 1112, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16635, 2006 WL 2741502 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
939 So. 2d 1112 (Castro v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Castro v. State
935 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)