Castro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Castro v. State

597 So. 2d 883, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4403, 1992 WL 73533

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 14, 1992

DocketNo. 90-2268

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 597 So. 2d 883 (Castro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Castro v. State, 597 So. 2d 883, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4403, 1992 WL 73533 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Glenn, 558 So.2d 4 (Fla.1990) (double jeopardy claims based on Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), cannot be retroactively applied on post conviction motion). See also Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989) (only persons who committed crimes before effective date of guidelines but who were sentenced after effective date may affirmatively select sentencing under guidelines).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Glenn, 558 So.2d 4 (Fla.1990) (double jeopardy claims based on Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), cannot be retroactively applied on post conviction motion). See also Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989) (only persons who committed crimes before effective date of guidelines but who were sentenced after effective date may affirmatively select sentencing under guidelines).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

597 So. 2d 883, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4403, 1992 WL 73533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castro-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack