Castro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Castro v. State

597 So. 2d 883, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4403, 1992 WL 73533

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 1992·No. No. 90-2268·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Glenn, 558 So.2d 4 (Fla.1990) (double jeopardy claims based on Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), cannot be retroactively applied on post conviction motion). See also Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989) (only persons who committed crimes before effective date of guidelines but who were sentenced after effective date may affirmatively select sentencing under guidelines).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Glenn, 558 So.2d 4 (Fla.1990) (double jeopardy claims based on Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), cannot be retroactively applied on post conviction motion). See also Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989) (only persons who committed crimes before effective date of guidelines but who were sentenced after effective date may affirmatively select sentencing under guidelines).

Castro v. State, 597 So. 2d 883, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4403, 1992 WL 73533 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

597 So. 2d 883 (Castro v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related