Castro v. Schriro

77 N.E.3d 359, 29 N.Y.3d 1005
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 1, 2017·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. Under the circumstances presented, the Appellate Division correctly held that the petition stated a claim for improper termination.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fa-hey, Garcia and Wilson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castro v. Schriro, 77 N.E.3d 359, 29 N.Y.3d 1005 (N.Y. 2017).

77 N.E.3d 359 (Castro v. Schriro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Dzaferovic v. New York City Dept. of Fin.
2024 NY Slip Op 32163(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Matter of Russell v. New York State Ins. Fund
2020 NY Slip Op 1717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Patterson v. City of New York
2019 NY Slip Op 4880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Okpo v. City of New York
2017 NY Slip Op 9272 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)