Castro v. Roe
This text of 114 F. App'x 351 (Castro v. Roe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Thomas A. Castro, a California state prisoner, appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He contends that California Jury Instruction 17.41.1 violated his constitutional rights. This contention is foreclosed by Brewer v. Hall, 378 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 F. App'x 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castro-v-roe-ca9-2004.