Castro v. Roe
114 F. App'x 351
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2004·No. No. 03-55987; D.C. No. CV-02-1961-BTM/AJB·Published
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Thomas A. Castro, a California state prisoner, appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He contends that California Jury Instruction 17.41.1 violated his constitutional rights. This contention is foreclosed by Brewer v. Hall, 378 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Castro v. Roe, 114 F. App'x 351 (9th Cir. 2004).
114 F. App'x 351 (Castro v. Roe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ronald James Brewer v. James Hall, Warden
378 F.3d 952 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)