Castro v. Party City of Baileys Crossroads, Inc.
Opinion
FILED
4/23/2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Sandra Castro, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 20-0585 (UNA)
)
Party City of Bailey’s Crossroads, Inc., )
)
Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This plaintiff filed a civil action last year following the Virginia Employment Commission’s decision to deny her application for unemployment benefits. The Court dismissed the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Castro v. Party City of Bailey’s Crossroads, Inc., No. 1:19-cv-1598 (D.D.C. June 12, 2019). The plaintiff appealed, and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of prosecution. See Castro v. Party City of Bailey’s Crossroads, Inc., No. 17-7115 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 22, 2020). Now before the Court is the plaintiff’s new complaint which, in essence, is an effort to pursue the appeal. The D.C. Circuit’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s prior appeal is a matter over which this Court lacks jurisdiction. See, e.g., Panko v. Rodak, 606 F.2d 168, 171 n.6 (7th Cir. 1979) (“[I]t seems axiomatic that a lower court may not order the judges or officers of a higher court to take an action.”).
The Court will grant the plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint and this civil action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An Order is issued separately.
DATE: April 23, 2020 AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Castro v. Party City of Baileys Crossroads, Inc. (Castro v. Party City of Baileys Crossroads, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.