Castro v. Cepero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Castro v. Cepero

299 A.D.2d 237, 749 N.Y.S.2d 419, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11212

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 2002·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered May 1, 2002, which [238] denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied since it may be reasonably inferred from the evidence that plaintiff, while bicycling, skidded and fell, by reason of dirt tracked onto the street from defendants’ steeply pitched intersecting dirt driveway (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Rose v Da Ecib USA, 259 AD2d 258, 259; Sheppard Intl, v Vogel, 147 AD2d 351, 352). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered May 1, 2002, which [238] denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied since it may be reasonably inferred from the evidence that plaintiff, while bicycling, skidded and fell, by reason of dirt tracked onto the street from defendants’ steeply pitched intersecting dirt driveway (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Rose v Da Ecib USA, 259 AD2d 258, 259; Sheppard Intl, v Vogel, 147 AD2d 351, 352). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Castro v. Cepero, 299 A.D.2d 237, 749 N.Y.S.2d 419, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11212 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

299 A.D.2d 237 (Castro v. Cepero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related