Castro v. Cepero
This text of 299 A.D.2d 237 (Castro v. Cepero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered May 1, 2002, which [238]*238denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Summary judgment was properly denied since it may be reasonably inferred from the evidence that plaintiff, while bicycling, skidded and fell, by reason of dirt tracked onto the street from defendants’ steeply pitched intersecting dirt driveway (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Rose v Da Ecib USA, 259 AD2d 258, 259; Sheppard Intl, v Vogel, 147 AD2d 351, 352). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 A.D.2d 237, 749 N.Y.S.2d 419, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castro-v-cepero-nyappdiv-2002.