Castro v. Bennet
2 Johns. 296
This text of 2 Johns. 296 (Castro v. Bennet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Castro v. Bennet, 2 Johns. 296 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1807).
Opinion
The conduct of the attorney is justifiable. He is not bound to go'on and expend money for his client without being secured. The cases cited show merely, that the court will compel an attorney to do his duty; but it is not his duty to expend money for his client without being reimbursed.
Rule refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gleason & Viele v. Clark
9 Cow. 57 (New York Supreme Court, 1828)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castro-v-bennet-nysupct-1807.