Castrillon v. ERM-Northeast, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Castrillon v. ERM-Northeast, Inc.

242 A.D.2d 654, 664 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9215

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 242 A.D.2d 654 (Castrillon v. ERM-Northeast, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Castrillon v. ERM-Northeast, Inc., 242 A.D.2d 654, 664 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries pursuant to Labor Law §§ 200, 240, and 241, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated June 11, 1996, as, in effect, granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were to dismiss the plaintiffs’ causes of action pursuant to Labor Law §§ 240 and 241.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Since the accident occurred in New Jersey, Labor Law §§ 240 and 241 are inapplicable (see, Padula v Lilarn Props. Corp., 84 NY2d 519; Grivas v Port Auth., 229 AD2d 301; Huston v Hayden Bldg. Maintenance Corp., 205 AD2d 68, 71). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries pursuant to Labor Law §§ 200, 240, and 241, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated June 11, 1996, as, in effect, granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were to dismiss the plaintiffs’ causes of action pursuant to Labor Law §§ 240 and 241.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Since the accident occurred in New Jersey, Labor Law §§ 240 and 241 are inapplicable (see, Padula v Lilarn Props. Corp., 84 NY2d 519; Grivas v Port Auth., 229 AD2d 301; Huston v Hayden Bldg. Maintenance Corp., 205 AD2d 68, 71). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D.2d 654, 664 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castrillon-v-erm-northeast-inc-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack