Castrillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
610 So. 2d 729, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13636, 1992 WL 385458
This text of 610 So. 2d 729 (Castrillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Castrillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 610 So. 2d 729, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13636, 1992 WL 385458 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
Nivia Castrillo appeals an order denying unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm. As stated in Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992):
In a hearing to determine eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits, the appeals referee acts as the finder of fact.... “The decision of an appeals referee must be affirmed if it is supported by competent substantial evidence.” ... The record discloses sufficient evidence supporting the referee’s findings; accordingly, the order must be affirmed.
Id. at 180-181 (citations omitted).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc.
605 So. 2d 180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
610 So. 2d 729, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13636, 1992 WL 385458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castrillo-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-1992.