Castrillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

610 So. 2d 729, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13636, 1992 WL 385458
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 1992·No. No. 91-2680·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nivia Castrillo appeals an order denying unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm. As stated in Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992):

In a hearing to determine eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits, the appeals referee acts as the finder of fact.... “The decision of an appeals referee must be affirmed if it is supported by competent substantial evidence.” ... The record discloses sufficient evidence supporting the referee’s findings; accordingly, the order must be affirmed.

Id. at 180-181 (citations omitted).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castrillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 610 So. 2d 729, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13636, 1992 WL 385458 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

610 So. 2d 729 (Castrillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc.
605 So. 2d 180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)