Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Castor v. State

Castor v. State

277 S.W.3d 343, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 150, 2009 WL 364793
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 17, 2009
DocketWD 69212
StatusPublished

This text of 277 S.W.3d 343 (Castor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castor v. State, 277 S.W.3d 343, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 150, 2009 WL 364793 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Randle Castor appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief in which he claimed counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate, explain to him, and pursue a defense of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spells v. State
277 S.W.3d 343 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 S.W.3d 343, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 150, 2009 WL 364793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castor-v-state-moctapp-2009.