Casto v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Fourth Circuit

Casto v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

670 F. App'x 119

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 3, 2016·No. No. 15-2280·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Willis Casto appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo Bank as to each of his claims in his civil complaint. We have reviewed the materials before the court, including the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Casto v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:13-cv-01142-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Willis Casto appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo Bank as to each of his claims in his civil complaint. We have reviewed the materials before the court, including the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Casto v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:13-cv-01142-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Casto v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 670 F. App'x 119 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 119 (Casto v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.