Casto v. Department of Highways
This text of 13 Ct. Cl. 377 (Casto v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This claim was submitted upon a duly executed written stipulation to the effect that the respondent is liable for damages in the amount of $8,000.00, based upon the following facts: Claimant is the owner of property and certain commercial buildings situate at Fairplain, Jackson County, West Virginia. During the period of [378]*378October through December, 1978, the respondent was conducting blasting operations on or near property adjacent to claimant’s property. The blasting operations produced concussions and vibrations in the earth which resulted in damages to claimant’s commercial buildings and property.
This Court is constrained to follow the rule of law established by the West Virginia Supreme Court in the case of Whitney v. Ralph Myers Contracting Corporation, 146 W.Va. 130, 118 S.E.2d 130 (1961), which recognizes that the use of explosives in blasting operations is intrinsically dangerous and extraordinarily hazardous; therefore, the party who undertakes the blasting is liable for any damage resulting to the property of another. Hence, the respondent in this case is liable to the claimant in the amount of $8,000.00, which is a fair and equitable estimate of the damages sustained.
Based on the foregoing facts, an award in the above amount is hereby made.
Award of $8,000.00
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Ct. Cl. 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casto-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1981.