Castlin v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Castlin v. State

1 S.E.2d 30, 187 Ga. 454, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 418

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1939·No. No. 12617·Published

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

The plaintiff in error made a motion for new trial which contained only the usual general grounds. Upon a careful reading of the evidence, this court is of the opinion that it supported the verdict, and the judgment of the lower court refusing a new trial is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. M. G. Hieles, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, J. Ralph Rosser, solicitor-general, Rllis G. Arnall, R. J. Glower, and J. Sante Crawford, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

The plaintiff in error made a motion for new trial which contained only the usual general grounds. Upon a careful reading of the evidence, this court is of the opinion that it supported the verdict, and the judgment of the lower court refusing a new trial is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. M. G. Hieles, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, J. Ralph Rosser, solicitor-general, Rllis G. Arnall, R. J. Glower, and J. Sante Crawford, contra.

Castlin v. State, 1 S.E.2d 30, 187 Ga. 454, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 418 (Ga. 1939).

Pincite

1 S.E.2d 30 (Castlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.