Castleberry v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Castleberry v. State

140 So. 924, 25 Ala. App. 612

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 5, 1932

Docket4 Div. 887.

StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 924 (Castleberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Castleberry v. State, 140 So. 924, 25 Ala. App. 612 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The prosecution against this appellant originated on June 7, 1931, by affidavit and warrant returnable to the county court which charged him with the offense of violating the prohibition laws of the state. From a judgment of conviction in said court he appealed to the circuit court and was again convicted; from the judgment in the circuit court this appeal was taken. The appeal is upon the record proper there being no bill of exceptions. As the record is regular and without error, the judgment of conviction in the circuit court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The prosecution against this appellant originated on June 7, 1931, by affidavit and warrant returnable to the county court which charged him with the offense of violating the prohibition laws of the state. From a judgment of conviction in said court he appealed to the circuit court and was again convicted; from the judgment in the circuit court this appeal was taken. The appeal is upon the record proper there being no bill of exceptions. As the record is regular and without error, the judgment of conviction in the circuit court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 So. 924, 25 Ala. App. 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castleberry-v-state-alactapp-1932.