Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Castleberry v. Castleberry

Castleberry v. Castleberry

29 So. 3d 1207, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3354, 2010 WL 935566
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 17, 2010
Docket1D09-3650
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 So. 3d 1207 (Castleberry v. Castleberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castleberry v. Castleberry, 29 So. 3d 1207, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3354, 2010 WL 935566 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Castleberry, the former husband, appeals an order that reduced but did not terminate his alimony obligation. Because the undisputed evidence in the record is that Rebecca Castleberry, the former wife, now earns more income than the former husband and there is no justification in the record for a continued alimony award under these circumstances, we agree with the former husband that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding more than a nominal amount of alimony. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for vacation of the order appealed from and entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

LEWIS, THOMAS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffith v. State
29 So. 3d 1207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 So. 3d 1207, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3354, 2010 WL 935566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castleberry-v-castleberry-fladistctapp-2010.