Castle v. United States

Federal Circuit

Castle v. United States

64 F. App'x 227

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 1, 2003·No. Nos. 01-5047, 01-5050·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

A petition for rehearing en banc having been filed by the CROSS-APPELLANTS and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the APPELLANT,* and the matter having first been referred as a petition for rehearing to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and response having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED and it is further

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

[228] The mandate of the court will issue on May 8, 2003.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

A petition for rehearing en banc having been filed by the CROSS-APPELLANTS and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the APPELLANT,* and the matter having first been referred as a petition for rehearing to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and response having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED and it is further

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

[228] The mandate of the court will issue on May 8, 2003.

Footnotes

Castle v. United States, 64 F. App'x 227 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

Pincite

64 F. App'x 227 (Castle v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related