Castle v. Fire Island Holding Corp.
This text of 249 A.D. 818 (Castle v. Fire Island Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to rescind contracts of purchase and sale of real property and'to recover the moneys paid thereon, the plaintiff appeals from (1) the order denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment; (2) the resettled order granting defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment; and (3) the judgment dismissing the complaint and granting judgment in favor of defendant on its counterclaim for the unpaid balance of the purchase price. The judgment and orders from which appeals are taken are affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel; JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents on the ground that the defendant was not entitled to recover on its counterclaim, having itself been in default.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 818, 292 N.Y.S. 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castle-v-fire-island-holding-corp-nyappdiv-1937.