Castle v. Brown Cracker & Candy Co.
31 S.W.2d 630, 119 Tex. 447, 1930 Tex. LEXIS 142
Opinion
While we do not think judgment properly reversed on error in charge on measure of damages, because such objection not timely presented, yet the same was properly reversed on argument of counsel as to his knowledge of plaintiff’s character.
The application for writ of error is accordingly dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Castle v. Brown Cracker & Candy Co., 31 S.W.2d 630, 119 Tex. 447, 1930 Tex. LEXIS 142 (Tex. 1930).
31 S.W.2d 630 (Castle v. Brown Cracker & Candy Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cunningham v. Suggs
340 S.W.2d 369 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Adams v. Adams
310 S.W.2d 813 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1958)
Phoenix Refining Co. v. Morgan
178 S.W.2d 175 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1944)
Baird v. Mills
119 S.W.2d 889 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
South Texas Coaches, Inc. v. Woodard
123 S.W.2d 395 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Texas & N. O. Ry. Co. v. New
95 S.W.2d 170 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Williams v. Rodocker
84 S.W.2d 556 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)