Castillo v. Western Range Association

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided March 2, 2020·No. 3:16-cv-00237·Unknown

Opinion

1} 1

||. él: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 19 || ABEL CANTARO CASTILLO; ALCIDES INGA RAMOS, and those similarly 20 || situated, “| Case No.: 3:16-CV-00237-RCJ-CLB 21 Plaintiffs, SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 22 |v, 23 || WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION; MELCHOR GRAGIRENA; 24 || EL TEJON SHEEP COMPANY; MOUNTAIN PLAINS AGRICULTURAL 25 || SERVICE; ESTILL RANCHES, LLC; and JOHN ESTILL 26 27 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated 28 || Protective Order submitted by Plaintiff Abel Cantaro Castillo and Defendant Western Range

2203427,1

1 || Association (hereinafter the “Parties”), by which the Parties agree, and the Court finds, pursuant to □

2 || FRCP 26(c), that good cause exists to support the entry ofa protective order over the discovery and |.

3 |Idissemination of certain information deemed confidential by one of the Parties. This Second 4 || Stipulated Protective Order will expedite the disclosure of information and production of documents 5 || protected by privilege or statutes, preserve the confidentiality of such information, protect privacy 6 |linterests of the Parties and non-parties, and help to avoid potential discovery disputes related to □ 7 information that is designated confidential. The Court, being fully advised, hereby ORDERS as 8 || follows: 9 GENERAL PROVISIONS 10 1. In this action, at least one of the Parties has sought and/or is seeking Confidential 11 || Material (as defined in paragraph 5 below). This Protective Order shall apply to all documents, 12 || materials, and information that is sought by a party either from other parties to this litigation or from 13 || any third party with possession or custody of Confidential Material during discovery, including 14 || without limitation, documents produced, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for 15 || admission, deposition testimony, and other information disclosed pursuant to the disclosure or 16 || discovery duties created by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Parties assert the disclosure 17 || of Confidential Material outside the scope of this litigation could result in significant injury to one 18 || or more of the Parties’ business or privacy interests, and could result in significant injury to a third »

19 || party’s privacy interests, as well as significantly erode the attorney-client privilege. The Parties have 20 || entered into this Stipulation and request the Court enter this Protective Order for the purpose of | 21 || preventing the disclosure and use of Confidential Material except as set forth herein. 22 2. As used in this Protective Order, “document” is defined as designated in FRCP 23 || 34(a)(1)(A). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this □□□□□ | 24 3. This Protective Order may be modified by the Court at any time for good cause 45 || shown following notice to all Parties and an opportunity for them to be heard. 26 4. Nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent any party or other person from seeking 27 || modification of this Order, from objecting to discovery that the party or other person believes to be 28 -2-

sonadoy | SECOND PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 || improper, or from filing a motion with respect to the manner in which Confidential Material shall

2 || be treated at trial. Nothing in this Protective Order shall prejudice the right of any party to contest 3 ||the alleged relevancy, admissibility, or discoverability of confidential documents or information 4 || sought. . 5 CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL 6 5. “Confidential Material” means those documents or personal identifying information 7 || that the designating party believes to be protected by law, including FRCP 26, and is designated by 8 |lone of the Parties in the manner provided in paragraph 15 below, the disclosure of which the

9 || designating party believes may implicate the privacy interests of Plaintiff, Defendant, third parties 10 |and/or information contained in confidential business records and communications by the

11 || designating party or a third party with possession or custody of such information. Any information |

12 || designated by a party as confidential will first be reviewed by counsel, and designation will be based 13 ||on a good faith belief that the information is confidential and entitled to protection under the law, 14 llincluding Rule 26. The documents or information so designated shall be deemed “Confidential 15 ||Material” subject to this Protective Order. Confidential Material does not include (a) any 16 || information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes 17 || part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not

18 || involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or

19 || otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained 20 || by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and

21 || under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. 22 6. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or

23 ||Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to

24 || limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The

25 || Designating Party must designate for protection only those pages of a document which qualify as

26 || Confidential Material, in order to avoid sweeping an entire document unjustifiably within the ambit 27 || of this Order, where only some pages contain Confidential Material. Indiscriminate designations of

28 -3-

SECOND PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 || confidentiality are inconsistent with this Order. If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that 2 || information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating | 3 || Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 4 7. Confidential Material shall not be disclosed to any person or entity not a party to this 5 || lawsuit except as expressly provided herein. Confidential Material shall only be used in this lawsuit

6 || between the Parties to this lawsuit only, including any appeal. Confidential Material shall not be 7 || disclosed to any person or entity other than the Parties to this suit, counsel who have entered an 8 || appearance in this case and their staff, Judges, Magistrates, law clerks and other clerical personnel 9 || of the Court before which the action is pending, and other individuals as designated in paragraph 10 □

10 || of this Protective Order. 11 8. Any Confidential Material produced during the course of this action shall be used 12 || solely for the purposes of this action between the Parties in this suit only, and shall not be disclosed □

13 || or used for any other purpose including, but not limited to, any business, commercial, competitive, 14 || or publicity purpose. All obligations and duties arising under this Protective Order shall survive the | 15 || termination of this action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castillo v. Western Range Association, (D. Nev. 2020).

Castillo v. Western Range Association (Castillo v. Western Range Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)