Castillo v. The Well Community Church

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 28, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-01460·Unknown

Opinion

KRYSTAL CASTILLO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01460-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED STIPULATION RE CONFIDENTIALITY; v. PROTECTIVE ORDER THE WELL COMMUNITY CHURCH, a (Doc. 23) California corporation, Defendant. Having considered the Amended Stipulation Re Confidentiality filed on July 27, 2022, and finding good cause, the Court adopts the stipulated protective order. (Doc. 23.) The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents subject to the protective order to be filed under seal must be accompanied by a written request which complies with Local Rule 141 prior to sealing. The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to show good cause for documents attached to a non-dispositive motion or compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). Within five (5) days of any approved document filed under seal, the party shall file a redacted copy of the sealed document. The redactions shall be narrowly tailored to protect only the information that is confidential or was deemed confidential. /// Additionally, the parties shall consider resolving any dispute arising under the stipulated protective order according to the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2022 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castillo v. The Well Community Church, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Castillo v. The Well Community Church (Castillo v. The Well Community Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)