Castillo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Castillo v. State

143 S.W.2d 1039

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 30, 1940

DocketNo, 21405

StatusPublished

This text of 143 S.W.2d 1039 (Castillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Castillo v. State, 143 S.W.2d 1039 (Tex. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of marihuana, a narcotic drug. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

Accompanying the record is the written motion of the appellant, duly verified, requesting the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of marihuana, a narcotic drug. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

Accompanying the record is the written motion of the appellant, duly verified, requesting the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 S.W.2d 1039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castillo-v-state-texcrimapp-1940.