Castillo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Castillo v. State

143 S.W.2d 1039

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Castillo v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 Tex. Crim. 217 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 30, 1940·No. No, 21405·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of marihuana, a narcotic drug. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

Accompanying the record is the written motion of the appellant, duly verified, requesting the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of marihuana, a narcotic drug. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

Accompanying the record is the written motion of the appellant, duly verified, requesting the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Castillo v. State, 143 S.W.2d 1039 (Tex. 1940).

Pincite

143 S.W.2d 1039 (Castillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.