Castillo v. State

11 S.W. 32, 27 Tex. Ct. App. 188, 1889 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 24
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 2, 1889·No. No. 2665·Published

Opinion

Hurt, Judge.

This conviction is for theft of a horse. We have very carefully examined the facts of this case, and are of opinion that they do not support the conviction, and we are not willing to sanction it, believing that to do so would be dangerous to the liberty of the citizen. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castillo v. State, 11 S.W. 32, 27 Tex. Ct. App. 188, 1889 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 24 (Tex. Ct. App. 1889).

11 S.W. 32 (Castillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.