Castillo v. State

212 So. 3d 404, 2017 WL 1013184, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3447
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Castillo v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5748
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 2017·No. No. 4D16-3081·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant challenges the denial of his post-conviction relief motion brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. The trial court denied the motion as untimely. Appellant filed the motion within one year of the appellate mandate. Rule 3.801(b) provides that no motion “shall be filed or considered pursuant to this rule if filed more than 1 year after the sentence becomes final.” A sentence becomes final when the appellate mandate issues. See generally Ghent v. State, 27 So.3d 121, 123 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Consequently, we accept the State’s concession and remand the case to the trial court for further review of the motion.

Reversed and Remanded.

Gross, May and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castillo v. State, 212 So. 3d 404, 2017 WL 1013184, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3447 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

212 So. 3d 404 (Castillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ghent v. State
27 So. 3d 121 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)