Castillo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Castillo v. State

380 So. 2d 1150, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16081

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 11, 1980

DocketNo. 78-2117

StatusPublished

This text of 380 So. 2d 1150 (Castillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Castillo v. State, 380 So. 2d 1150, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16081 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM,

Appellant, Jesus Castillo, has appealed from a judgment and sentence entered after he was found guilty by a jury of robbery while carrying a firearm. Appellant was sentenced to five years in the penitentiary with a mandatory minimum sentence of three years pursuant to Section 775.-087(2)(a) Florida Statutes (1977).

Appellant seeks reversal on the grounds of insufficiency of identification, admission of prejudicial evidence, inadequate jury instructions and imposition of improper sentence.

We have carefully considered the points on appeal in light of the record, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Douglas v. State, 328 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976); Smith v. State, 375 So.2d 864 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Abbott v. State, 334 So.2d 642 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); Williams v. State, 307 So.2d 877 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Section 775.087(2)(a) Florida Statutes (1977). The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI