Castillo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Castillo v. State

227 So. 2d 323

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 28, 1969

DocketNo. 69-330

StatusPublished

This text of 227 So. 2d 323 (Castillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Castillo v. State, 227 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Castillo, appeals from a judgment of conviction for the unlawful possession of marijuana.

In his brief he argues three points for reversal but in oral argument only argued the question of whether there was sufficient, competent evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment of conviction.

We have examined the three points for reversal submitted by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See Zalla v. State, Fla.1952, 61 So.2d 649; and Moore v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 475.

The judgment of conviction herein appealed is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Castillo, appeals from a judgment of conviction for the unlawful possession of marijuana.

In his brief he argues three points for reversal but in oral argument only argued the question of whether there was sufficient, competent evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment of conviction.

We have examined the three points for reversal submitted by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See Zalla v. State, Fla.1952, 61 So.2d 649; and Moore v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 475.

The judgment of conviction herein appealed is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 So. 2d 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castillo-v-state-fladistctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack