Castillo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Castillo v. State

227 So. 2d 323

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 28, 1969·No. No. 69-330·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Castillo, appeals from a judgment of conviction for the unlawful possession of marijuana.

In his brief he argues three points for reversal but in oral argument only argued the question of whether there was sufficient, competent evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment of conviction.

We have examined the three points for reversal submitted by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See Zalla v. State, Fla.1952, 61 So.2d 649; and Moore v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 475.

The judgment of conviction herein appealed is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Castillo, appeals from a judgment of conviction for the unlawful possession of marijuana.

In his brief he argues three points for reversal but in oral argument only argued the question of whether there was sufficient, competent evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment of conviction.

We have examined the three points for reversal submitted by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See Zalla v. State, Fla.1952, 61 So.2d 649; and Moore v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 475.

The judgment of conviction herein appealed is affirmed.

Castillo v. State, 227 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

227 So. 2d 323 (Castillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related