Castillo v. Spilnyk

195 Misc. 386, 91 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2620
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 2, 1949
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 195 Misc. 386 (Castillo v. Spilnyk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castillo v. Spilnyk, 195 Misc. 386, 91 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court was without jurisdiction to assess

penalties under the Housing and Rent Act of 1947 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1881 et seq.) for a period greater than twelve months prior to the commencement of the action, even though the Statute of Limitations was not pleaded (Lindner v. Miracle Realty Corp., N. Y. L. J., Oct. 18, 1947, p. 924, col. 7 [App. Term, 2d Dept.]; Thompson v. Taylor, 62 F. Supp. 930; Bowles v. Babcock, 65 F. Supp. 380).

It was error, too, for the court to have considered the area rent attorney’s interpretation in resolving the facts of this case.

The judgment should he unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial granted, with $30 costs to the defendants to abide the event.

Steinbrink, Fennelly and Golden, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kravitz v. Nankin
200 Misc. 219 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 Misc. 386, 91 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castillo-v-spilnyk-nyappterm-1949.