Castillo v. Russell

920 So. 2d 863, 2006 La. LEXIS 529, 2006 WL 350000
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 10, 2006·No. No. 2005-OC-2110·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In Re Castillo, Vincent Mark; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. G, Nos. 590-861; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 05-CM-561.

Granted. It is well-settled that appeals are favored in the law. Unless the ground urged for dismissal is free from doubt, the appeal should be maintained. U.S. Fire Insurance Co. v. Swann, 424 So.2d 240, 244-45 (La.1982). Considering relator represents that he never received the May 24, 2005 order directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as abandoned, the ground for dismissal is not free from doubt. Accordingly the judgment of the court of appeal dismissing relator’s appeal is vacated and his appeal is reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castillo v. Russell, 920 So. 2d 863, 2006 La. LEXIS 529, 2006 WL 350000 (La. 2006).

920 So. 2d 863 (Castillo v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. La. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr.
242 So. 3d 614 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
Joseph v. Wasserman
194 So. 3d 720 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)
Graham v. Crawford
176 So. 3d 1148 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
Succession of LeBouef
153 So. 3d 527 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2014)