Castillo v. Kyle

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 10, 1996·No. 95-50850·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50850 Conference Calendar

NICHOLAS CASTILLO,

Plaintiff-Appellant, versus

JACK KYLE ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CV-325 - - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nicholas Castillo appeals the district court’s dismissal of

his civil rights suit as frivolous. He argues that the district

court erred in determining that the change in the interval in his

parole review did not run afoul the Ex Post Facto Clause. We

have reviewed the record and determined that the district court

did not abuse its discretion. Allison v. Kyle, 66 F.3d 71, 73-74

(5th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castillo v. Kyle, (5th Cir. 1996).

Castillo v. Kyle (Castillo v. Kyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allison v. Kyle
66 F.3d 71 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)