Castillo v. Florida Power & Light Co.

884 So. 2d 450, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14820, 2004 WL 2238522
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 6, 2004
DocketNo. 3D03-1809
StatusPublished

This text of 884 So. 2d 450 (Castillo v. Florida Power & Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castillo v. Florida Power & Light Co., 884 So. 2d 450, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14820, 2004 WL 2238522 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Mozee v. Champion Int’l Corp., 554 So.2d 596, 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (property owner not liable for the electrocution of subcontractor of independent contractor’s employee where property owner informed subcontractor electrical wiring was still hot); Lemen v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 452 So.2d 1107, 1108 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (property owner not liable for injuries to employee of independent contractor in absence of a showing of a positive act of negligence which proximately causes such injury).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lemen v. Florida Power & Light Co.
452 So. 2d 1107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Mozee v. Champion Intern. Corp.
554 So. 2d 596 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 So. 2d 450, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14820, 2004 WL 2238522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castillo-v-florida-power-light-co-fladistctapp-2004.