Castillo v. Coughlin
This text of 193 A.D.2d 601 (Castillo v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the petitioner from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), dated May 10, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 A.D.2d 601, 598 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castillo-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1993.