Castillo v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Castillo v. Coughlin

193 A.D.2d 601, 598 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4587

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 3, 1993·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the petitioner from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), dated May 10, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the petitioner from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), dated May 10, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Castillo v. Coughlin, 193 A.D.2d 601, 598 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

193 A.D.2d 601 (Castillo v. Coughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related