Castillo v. Central Park Tower Condominium

2024 NY Slip Op 34003(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedNovember 12, 2024
DocketIndex No. 158801/2022
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 34003(U) (Castillo v. Central Park Tower Condominium) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castillo v. Central Park Tower Condominium, 2024 NY Slip Op 34003(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

Castillo v Central Park Tower Condominium 2024 NY Slip Op 34003(U) November 12, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 158801/2022 Judge: Judy H. Kim Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 158801/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 109 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. JUDY H. KIM PART 04 Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 158801/2022 ANGEL CASTILLO, MOTION DATE 09/06/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 002 -v- CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM, BROADWAY 57TH/58TH RETAIL INVESTOR, LLC, NORDSTROM, INC., LENDLEASE (US) CONSTRUCTION INC., EXTELL DECISION + ORDER ON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY D/B/A BROADWAY TRIO LLC, EXTELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, BROADWAY TRIO MOTION LLC,

Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM, EXTELL Third-Party DEVELOPMENT COMPANY D/B/A BROADWAY TRIO LLC, Index No. 595587/2023 EXTELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, BROADWAY TRIO LLC

Third-Party Plaintiffs,

-against-

STRAUSS-CREATIVE FINISHES, INC.

Third-Party Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 91, 92, 93, 94, 95 were read on this motion to CONSOLIDATE .

Upon the foregoing documents, plaintiff’s motion to consolidate is granted without

opposition.

On October 14, 2022, plaintiff commenced this action alleging that on or about September

20, 2021, while acting within the scope of his employment at the construction site at 217 W. 57th

Street, New York, NY, he was caused to fall and sustain serious and personal injuries due to the

158801/2022 CASTILLO, ANGEL vs. CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM ET AL Page 1 of 5 Motion No. 002

1 of 5 [* 1] INDEX NO. 158801/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 109 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2024

negligence of defendants. Plaintiff subsequently commenced an action in the Supreme Court of

New York, Queens County under Index Number 160124/2023, Angel Castillo v Smitell LLC,

Smitell Retail LLC, Smitell Development Group LLC and Smitell Legacy LLC (the “Queens

Action”). Plaintiff now moves to consolidate the Queens County Action within the instant action.

Plaintiff’s motion is granted. “Consolidation is generally favored in the interest of judicial

economy ... where cases present common questions of law and fact, unless the party opposing the

motion demonstrates that a consolidation will prejudice a substantial right” (Raboy v McCrory

Corp, 210 AD2d 145 [1st Dept 19941 quoting Amtorg Trading Corp v Broadway & 56th St Assoc,

191 AD2d 212, 213 [1st Dept 1993]) and it is undisputed that the Queens Action and the instant

action arise from the same workplace accident and present common questions of law and fact.

Since this action was commenced prior to the Queens Action and the events at issue in both actions

occurred in this county, New York County is the proper venue for the consolidated action (See

Harrison v Harrison, 16 AD3d 206, 207 [1st Dept 2005] “[w]here two actions involving identical

issues are pending in separate counties, the actions should be consolidated pursuant to CPLR §

602 in the county where the first action was commenced absent special circumstances”).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion is granted and the action Angel Castillo v Smitell LLC,

Smitell Retail LLC, Smitell Development Group LLC and Smitell Legacy LLC, pending in the

Supreme Court, Queens County under index number 160124/2023, shall be consolidated within

the present action; it is further

ORDERED that the consolidation shall take place under Index Number 158801/2022 and

the consolidated action shall bear the following caption:

158801/2022 CASTILLO, ANGEL vs. CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM ET AL Page 2 of 5 Motion No. 002

2 of 5 [* 2] INDEX NO. 158801/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 109 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X ANGEL CASTILLO, Index No.: 158801/2022

Plaintiff,

CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM, BROADWAY 57TH/58TH RETAIL INVESTOR, LLC, NORDSTROM, INC., LENDLEASE (US) CONSTRUCTION INC., EXTELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY D/B/A BROADWAY TRIO LLC, EXTELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, BROADWAY TRIO LLC, SMITELL LLC, SMITELL RETAIL LLC, SMITELL DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC and SMITELL LEGACY LLC, Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM, EXTELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY D/B/A BROADWAY TRIO Third-Party Index No. 595587/2023 LLC, EXTELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and BROADWAY TRIO, LLC,

Third-Party Plaintiff,

STRAUSS-CREATIVE FINISHES, INC.,

Third-Party Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

and it is further

ORDERED that the pleadings in these actions are hereby consolidated and shall stand as

the pleadings in the consolidated action; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, shall transfer the

documents on file in Angel Castillo v Smitell LLC, Smitell Retail LLC, Smitell Development

Group LLC and Smitell Legacy LLC, Index No. 160124/2023, to the Clerk of this Court for the

purpose of consolidation; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County and the Clerk of this

Court shall coordinate the transfer of the documents being transferred so as to ensure an efficient

158801/2022 CASTILLO, ANGEL vs. CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM ET AL Page 3 of 5 Motion No. 002

3 of 5 [* 3] INDEX NO. 158801/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 109 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2024

transfer and to minimize insofar as practical the reproduction of such documents, including with

regard to any documents that may be in digital format; and it is further

ORDERED that, within thirty days from entry of this order, counsel for plaintiff shall

serve a certified copy of this order upon the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, and shall

pay the appropriate fee, if any, for such transfer and shall contact the staff of said Clerk to arrange

for the effectuation of the transfer in an efficient manner; and it is further

ORDERED that service upon the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County shall be

made in accordance with any applicable protocol or other procedures of said county; and it is

further

ORDERED that, within thirty days from entry of this order, plaintiff shall serve a copy of

this order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the Court, who shall consolidate the documents in

the actions hereby consolidated and shall mark his records to reflect the consolidation; and it is

ORDERED that, as applicable and insofar as is practical, the Clerk of this Court shall file

the documents transferred from the Supreme Court, Queens County in the consolidated case file

under the index number of this action in the New York State Courts Electronic Filing System or

make appropriate notations of such documents in the e-filing records of the court so as to ensure

access to the documents in the consolidated action; and it is further

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrison v. Harrison
16 A.D.3d 206 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Amtorg Trading Corp. v. Broadway & 56th Street Associates
191 A.D.2d 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 34003(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castillo-v-central-park-tower-condominium-nysupctnewyork-2024.