Castillo v. Castillo

302 A.D.2d 458, 754 N.Y.S.2d 582
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 10, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 302 A.D.2d 458 (Castillo v. Castillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castillo v. Castillo, 302 A.D.2d 458, 754 N.Y.S.2d 582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Dounias, J.), dated December 19, 2001, as denied his objections to an order of the same court (Rodriguez, H.E.), entered October 26, 2001, which, after a hearing, awarded the mother child support in the sum of $2,091.37 per month and arrears in the sum of $2,333.40.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[459]*459Contrary to the father’s contention, the Hearing Examiner properly refused, to deduct unreimbursed business expenses in computing his income for purposes of the Child Support Standards Act, as he failed to submit evidence sufficient to support his claim regarding those expenses (see Mellen v Mellen, 260 AD2d 609; cf. Matter of Dodaro v Beyer, 297 AD2d 379; Graves v Smith, 284 AD2d 332, 333; La Porte v La Porte, 263 AD2d 585, 587; Faber v Faber, 206 AD2d 644). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Heintzman v. Heintzman
2018 NY Slip Op 145 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 A.D.2d 458, 754 N.Y.S.2d 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castillo-v-castillo-nyappdiv-2003.