Castillo-Tapis v. Gonzales
This text of 176 F. App'x 813 (Castillo-Tapis v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Bias Castillo-Tapis, his wife Maria Del Carmen Lopez, and their son Eymard Roman Castillo, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance without opinion of an immigration judge’s denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), we lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to demonstrate the requisite exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 F. App'x 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castillo-tapis-v-gonzales-ca9-2006.