Castille v. TOWN OF HENDERSON
This text of 998 So. 2d 277 (Castille v. TOWN OF HENDERSON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Harry J. CASTILLE
v.
TOWN OF HENDERSON.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
John L. Olivier, Olivier & Brinkhaus, Sunset, LA, for Defendant/Appellant: Town of Henderson.
Karl J. Koch, Attorney at Law, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee: Harry J. Castille.
*278 Court composed of SYLVIA R. COOKS, MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN, and BILLY HOWARD EZELL, Judges.
EZELL, Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the consolidated case of Phillip M. Roberts vs. Town of Henderson, 08-443 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/5/2008) 998 So.2d 272, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to the Town of Henderson.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
998 So. 2d 277, 2008 WL 4792714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castille-v-town-of-henderson-lactapp-2008.