Castiglia v. County of Ontario

140 A.D.3d 1648, 32 N.Y.S.3d 777
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 10, 2016
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 A.D.3d 1648 (Castiglia v. County of Ontario) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castiglia v. County of Ontario, 140 A.D.3d 1648, 32 N.Y.S.3d 777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County [Thomas A. Stander, J.], entered Oct. 2, 2015) to annul a determination of respondents. The determination terminated the employment of petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking to annul the determination finding him guilty of disciplinary charges and terminating his employment as a correction officer for respondents. We conclude that the determination is supported by substantial evidence, i.e., “such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact” {300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]; see CPLR 7803 [4]; see generally Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 230-231 [1974]). We further conclude that, in view of petitioner’s extensive disciplinary record, the penalty of terminating his employment is not “so disproportionate to the offense[s] as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness,” and thus it does not constitute an abuse of discretion as a matter of law {Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001], rearg denied 96 NY2d 854 [2001]; see Matter of Seltzer v City of Rochester, 77 AD3d 1300, 1301 [2010]).

Present — Peradotto, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Curran and Troutman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mirza v. College of Mount St. Vincent
2025 NY Slip Op 50342(U) (New York Supreme Court, Bronx County, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.3d 1648, 32 N.Y.S.3d 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castiglia-v-county-of-ontario-nyappdiv-2016.