Casterlin v. Mullin
This text of 26 A.D.2d 629 (Casterlin v. Mullin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to declare void an amendment of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Newburgh, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered May 25, 1965, which granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the peiition. Appeal dismissed, with costs. In this proceeding petitioners have appealed from a decision of Special Term, dated March 30, 1965. They have failed to appeal from the order thereon, entered May 25, 1965, which granted the motion. Hence, this court does not have jurisdiction to review Special Term’s order. We nevertheless note that, were Special Term's order before us for review, we would affirm on the ground assigned by Special Term (Matter of Neddo v. Schrade, 270 N. Y. 97; Matter of Paliotto v. Cohalan, 6 A D 2d 886, affd. 8 N Y 2d 1065; Matter of Iraci v. Harwood, 6 A D 2d 815). Beldock, P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.2d 629, 272 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casterlin-v-mullin-nyappdiv-1966.