Casterlin v. Mullin

26 A.D.2d 629, 272 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3656
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 5, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to declare void an amendment of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Newburgh, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered May 25, 1965, which granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the peiition. Appeal dismissed, with costs. In this proceeding petitioners have appealed from a decision of Special Term, dated March 30, 1965. They have failed to appeal from the order thereon, entered May 25, 1965, which granted the motion. Hence, this court does not have jurisdiction to review Special Term’s order. We nevertheless note that, were Special Term's order before us for review, we would affirm on the ground assigned by Special Term (Matter of Neddo v. Schrade, 270 N. Y. 97; Matter of Paliotto v. Cohalan, 6 A D 2d 886, affd. 8 N Y 2d 1065; Matter of Iraci v. Harwood, 6 A D 2d 815). Beldock, P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casterlin v. Mullin, 26 A.D.2d 629, 272 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

26 A.D.2d 629 (Casterlin v. Mullin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. Mance
598 F. Supp. 2d 371 (W.D. New York, 2009)