Castenada v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Castenada v. State

11 Tex. Ct. App. 390

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 1, 1882·Published

Opinion

White, P. J.

Appellant was indicted for the crime of burglary with intent to steal. The judgment will be reversed for failure of the court to charge the jury upon the law of theft. When burglary is charged to have been committed with intent to commit theft, or to steal, the law of theft as well as that of burglary should be given in charge to the jury. Simms v. State, 2 Texas Ct. App. 110.

Reversed and remanded,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White, P. J.

Appellant was indicted for the crime of burglary with intent to steal. The judgment will be reversed for failure of the court to charge the jury upon the law of theft. When burglary is charged to have been committed with intent to commit theft, or to steal, the law of theft as well as that of burglary should be given in charge to the jury. Simms v. State, 2 Texas Ct. App. 110.

Reversed and remanded,

Castenada v. State, 11 Tex. Ct. App. 390 (Tex. Ct. App. 1882).

Pincite

11 Tex. Ct. App. 390 (Castenada v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.