Castellucci Vs. Dist. Ct. (New Castle, Llc)

Nevada Supreme Court

Castellucci Vs. Dist. Ct. (New Castle, Llc)

DecidedAugust 10, 2020

Docket81458

StatusPublished

This text of Castellucci Vs. Dist. Ct. (New Castle, Llc) (Castellucci Vs. Dist. Ct. (New Castle, Llc)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Castellucci Vs. Dist. Ct. (New Castle, Llc), (Neb. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LUCIANA CASTELLUCCI, No. 81458 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE TREVOR L. ATKIN, DISTRICT JUDGE, FILED Respondents, AUG 1 0 2020 and NEW CASTLE, LLC; MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL; SPI ENTERTAINMENT; AND THUNDER FROM DOWN UNDER, LLC, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, OR ALTERNATIVELY, PROHIBITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus, or alternatively, prohibition seeks a writ directing the district court to reverse its order compelling arbitration and remand to the district court to determine whether an enforceable agreement to arbitrate exists. Having considered petitioner's arguments and the supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). In particular, petitioner

SUMMICOORT OF NEVADA

0) I947A 403., 0 ••• has an adequate remedy in the form of an appeal from final judgment. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

C.J. Pickering

J. Hardesty

44L5(1 J. Stiglich

cc: Hon. Trevor L. Atkin, District Judge Harper Selim Hutchison & Steffen, LLC/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LUCIANA CASTELLUCCI, No. 81458 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE TREVOR L. ATKIN, DISTRICT JUDGE, FILED Respondents, AUG 1 0 2020 and NEW CASTLE, LLC; MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL; SPI ENTERTAINMENT; AND THUNDER FROM DOWN UNDER, LLC, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, OR ALTERNATIVELY, PROHIBITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus, or alternatively, prohibition seeks a writ directing the district court to reverse its order compelling arbitration and remand to the district court to determine whether an enforceable agreement to arbitrate exists. Having considered petitioner's arguments and the supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). In particular, petitioner

SUMMICOORT OF NEVADA

0) I947A 403., 0 ••• has an adequate remedy in the form of an appeal from final judgment. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

C.J. Pickering

J. Hardesty

44L5(1 J. Stiglich

cc: Hon. Trevor L. Atkin, District Judge Harper Selim Hutchison & Steffen, LLC/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Castellucci Vs. Dist. Ct. (New Castle, Llc), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castellucci-vs-dist-ct-new-castle-llc-nev-2020.

Opinion

J. Hardesty

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack