Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Castellucci v. Goldmann

Castellucci v. Goldmann

217 A.D.2d 1003, 631 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8442
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 14, 1995
StatusPublished

This text of 217 A.D.2d 1003 (Castellucci v. Goldmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castellucci v. Goldmann, 217 A.D.2d 1003, 631 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The determination to award petitioner custody of her two children has a substantial basis in the record (see, Matter of Gloria S. v Richard B., 80 AD2d 72, 76). Because Family Court is "in the most advantageous position to evaluate the testimony, character, and sincerity of the parties” (DeJesus v DeJesus, 208 AD2d 587, 588; see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167), its findings are entitled to the greatest respect (see, Matter of Irene O., 38 NY2d 776, 777). (Appeal from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J.—Custody.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of O.
38 N.Y.2d 776 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Eschbach v. Eschbach
436 N.E.2d 1260 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Gloria S. v. Richard B.
80 A.D.2d 72 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
DeJesus v. DeJesus
208 A.D.2d 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 A.D.2d 1003, 631 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castellucci-v-goldmann-nyappdiv-1995.