Castellucci v. Goldmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Castellucci v. Goldmann

217 A.D.2d 1003, 631 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8442

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1995·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The determination to award petitioner custody of her two children has a substantial basis in the record (see, Matter of Gloria S. v Richard B., 80 AD2d 72, 76). Because Family Court is "in the most advantageous position to evaluate the testimony, character, and sincerity of the parties” (DeJesus v DeJesus, 208 AD2d 587, 588; see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167), its findings are entitled to the greatest respect (see, Matter of Irene O., 38 NY2d 776, 777). (Appeal from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J.—Custody.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The determination to award petitioner custody of her two children has a substantial basis in the record (see, Matter of Gloria S. v Richard B., 80 AD2d 72, 76). Because Family Court is "in the most advantageous position to evaluate the testimony, character, and sincerity of the parties” (DeJesus v DeJesus, 208 AD2d 587, 588; see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167), its findings are entitled to the greatest respect (see, Matter of Irene O., 38 NY2d 776, 777). (Appeal from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J.—Custody.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Balio, JJ.

Castellucci v. Goldmann, 217 A.D.2d 1003, 631 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

217 A.D.2d 1003 (Castellucci v. Goldmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related