Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Castellon v. Ortez

Castellon v. Ortez

297 A.D.2d 699, 747 N.Y.2d 387, 747 N.Y.S.2d 387, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8677
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 297 A.D.2d 699 (Castellon v. Ortez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castellon v. Ortez, 297 A.D.2d 699, 747 N.Y.2d 387, 747 N.Y.S.2d 387, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8677 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In opposition to the defendant’s prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter or law, the plaintiff met his burden of demonstrating the existence of a triable issue of fact with respect to whether he sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Stark v Amadio, 239 AD2d 569; Rut v Grigonis, 214 AD2d 721; Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Goldstein, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacobsen v. Morales
300 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 699, 747 N.Y.2d 387, 747 N.Y.S.2d 387, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castellon-v-ortez-nyappdiv-2002.