Castello v. State

36 Tex. 324
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1872·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Walker, J.

The property alleged to have been stolen, is not of that class enumerated in the act of November 12th, 1866, unless we can suppose that neat stock or beeves come under the denomination of cattle.

But the indictment is uncertain; it charges the theft of three head of neat stock or beeves. The word beeves may include neat stock, but all néat stock are not beeves, in common or legal parlance. The indictment does not charge the taking of the animals from the possession of any person.

The judgment of the District Court must be reversed and the cause dismissed.

Beversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castello v. State, 36 Tex. 324 (Tex. 1872).

36 Tex. 324 (Castello v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Countryman v. State
106 S.W. 181 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1907)
Territory of New Mexico v. Christman
9 N.M. 582 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1899)
Thomas v. State
18 Tex. Ct. App. 213 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1885)