Castelli v. Trahan
This text of 77 A.D. 472 (Castelli v. Trahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought to foreclose certain mechanics’ liens for work and labor performed by the plaintiff and his assignor. It was tried before a referee, and there was a conflict of evidence upon the issues presented by the pleadings, which the referee has resolved in favor of the plaintiff, judgment being entered in his behalf. We are of. opinion that the findings of fact are supported by the evidence, and concur in the conclusions of law, iñ so far as they relate to the personal claim of the plaintiff.
It is, however, established by authority that in the absence of a [473]*473valid lien there can be no personal judgment in actions of this character. (Dudley v. Congregation, etc., of St. Francis, 138 N. Y. 451, 458, and authority there cited; McDonald v. Mayor, 58 App. Div. 73, 75, and authorities there cited), and as the referee hasfound as a fact that the claim of plaintiff’s assignor was not a valid lien, it follows that the personal judgment against the defendantscannot be supported in so far as it is founded upon the lien of Raffaele Giordano.
The judgment must be modified in accordance with this opinion,, and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.
All concurred.
Judgment modified in accordance with opinion per curiam, and. as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 A.D. 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castelli-v-trahan-nyappdiv-1902.