Castellar Pacheco v. Torres Maldonado

51 F. App'x 324
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedNovember 27, 2002
Docket01-2485
StatusPublished

This text of 51 F. App'x 324 (Castellar Pacheco v. Torres Maldonado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castellar Pacheco v. Torres Maldonado, 51 F. App'x 324 (1st Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case comes to us after a jury found the plaintiffs had suffered adverse employment consequences due to their political affiliation. The defendants-appellants, who are the mayor and three other officials of the municipal government of Peñ-uelas, Puerto Rico as well as the municipality itself, have appealed the denial of their post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law.

The municipal officials were sued in both their official and individual capacities. They have not appealed as individuals, and in fact the monetary judgments below have been satisfied by payments on their behalf to the plaintiffs-appellees. Consequently, the parties have agreed that, but for an issue involving reinstatement of one of the plaintiffs, Nelson Castellar Pacheco, this appeal may be dismissed as moot. As to the reinstatement of Castellar Pacheco, there has not been an appeal taken from the post-trial order granting his reinstatement. See Fed. R.App. P. 3(c)(1)(B) (notice of appeal must designate judgment or order appealed from).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 F. App'x 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castellar-pacheco-v-torres-maldonado-ca1-2002.