Castellanos v. State

89 So. 3d 1053, 2012 WL 1938736, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8634
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 30, 2012·No. No. 3D11-93·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994) (holding invocation of right to an attorney must be unambiguous and unequivocal); accord Alvarez v. State, 890 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castellanos v. State, 89 So. 3d 1053, 2012 WL 1938736, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8634 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

89 So. 3d 1053 (Castellanos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. United States
512 U.S. 452 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Alvarez v. State
890 So. 2d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)