Castellanos v. State
89 So. 3d 1053, 2012 WL 1938736, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8634
This text of 89 So. 3d 1053 (Castellanos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Castellanos v. State, 89 So. 3d 1053, 2012 WL 1938736, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8634 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994) (holding invocation of right to an attorney must be unambiguous and unequivocal); accord Alvarez v. State, 890 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Davis v. United States
512 U.S. 452 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Alvarez v. State
890 So. 2d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
89 So. 3d 1053, 2012 WL 1938736, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castellanos-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.