Castellanos v. K-Mart Store

632 So. 2d 1057, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 423, 1994 WL 26907
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 1994·No. No. 93-1706·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment in defendant’s favor entered after the court granted defendant’s motion for directed verdict. The trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for continuance after allowing plaintiffs counsel to withdraw on the day of trial. Castle Club Corp. v. Liberty Int’l, Inc., 598 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Hub Financial Corp. v. Olmetti, 465 So.2d 618 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The record does not demonstrate that defendant would have been prejudiced by allowing plaintiff a continuance to obtain new counsel. Castle Club Corp., 598 So.2d at 263.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castellanos v. K-Mart Store, 632 So. 2d 1057, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 423, 1994 WL 26907 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

632 So. 2d 1057 (Castellanos v. K-Mart Store) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fleming v. Fleming
710 So. 2d 601 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Buscemi v. 6060 Realty Corp.
654 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Sacco v. Slavin
641 So. 2d 955 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)