Castellano v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines

15 F.R.D. 276, 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4325
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 11, 1953
DocketCiv. A. No. 12698
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 F.R.D. 276 (Castellano v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castellano v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines, 15 F.R.D. 276, 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4325 (E.D. Pa. 1953).

Opinion

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

Paragraph 4 of the motion for the production of documents under Rule 34, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C., asks for “AÍ1 boiler inspection' reports or other reports required to be filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission on the said locomotive.” In the briefs submitted, both parties have assumed that the reports asked for were those required by Sections 38 and 40, U.S.C.A., Title 45, relating to reports and evidence submitted by railroads, in connection with accidents. At any rate, that was the only point argued.

These reports are clearly protected by Section 41 — not because they are made inadmissible as evidence but because the Act provides that they shall not be “used for any purpose” in any suit for damages. Certainly this covers their use for purposes of discovery.

The defendant’s objection is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yanick v. Pennsylvania Railroad
192 F. Supp. 373 (E.D. New York, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 F.R.D. 276, 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castellano-v-pennsylvania-reading-seashore-lines-paed-1953.