Castellano v. Metwaly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Castellano v. Metwaly

259 A.D.2d 724, 685 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3175

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 724 (Castellano v. Metwaly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Castellano v. Metwaly, 259 A.D.2d 724, 685 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3175 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated March 26, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations and denied, as academic, their cross motion to strike the defendant’s affirmative defense based thereon.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs’ action is barred by the Statute of Limitations, and that the toll provided by CPLR 207 does not apply (see, CPLR 214, 207 [3]; EPTL 5-4.1). The appellant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated March 26, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations and denied, as academic, their cross motion to strike the defendant’s affirmative defense based thereon.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs’ action is barred by the Statute of Limitations, and that the toll provided by CPLR 207 does not apply (see, CPLR 214, 207 [3]; EPTL 5-4.1). The appellant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 724, 685 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castellano-v-metwaly-nyappdiv-1999.