Castellano v. Bader Bros. Van Lines, Inc.

208 So. 2d 842, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5835
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 16, 1968
DocketNo. 68-61
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 208 So. 2d 842 (Castellano v. Bader Bros. Van Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castellano v. Bader Bros. Van Lines, Inc., 208 So. 2d 842, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5835 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for writ of certiorari to the circuit court to review an interlocutory order transferring petitioner’s suit against respondent to the civil court of record. Petitioner’s claim was for damages in excess of Ten Thousand Dollars arising out of the total destruction of petitioner’s property while being transported by respondent under a contract of carriage.

The trial judge, upon consideration of the pleadings and exhibits in the cause, determined that the petitioner’s damages were limited to not more than One Thousand Dollars, an amount below the jurisdiction of the circuit court and within the jurisdiction of the civil court of record. Pursuant to such determination the trial judge entered the order of transfer here under review.

We have carefully considered the record on appeal, briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that it was error to enter the order of transfer.

In determining the circuit court’s jurisdiction the test is the amount in good faith claimed or put in controversy when the action is commenced. We find nothing [843]*843in the record showing that petitioner did not initially make her demand in good faith, although it may have developed on the trial of the cause that the amount recoverable was less than the jurisdictional limit of the circuit court. Tantillo v. Miliman, Fla.1956, 87 So.2d 413; Gannett v. King, Fla.App. 1959, 108 So.2d 299.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the order is quashed with directions to reinstate the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Plutt v. Ross
230 So. 3d 883 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
White Const. Co., Inc. v. State, Dept. of Transp.
860 So. 2d 1064 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Soler v. Independent Fire Ins. Co.
625 So. 2d 905 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Neumann v. Brigman
475 So. 2d 1247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Dade County v. Lambert
334 So. 2d 844 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Norris v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel.
324 So. 2d 108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Thibadeau v. Santini Bros., Inc.
315 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Massachusetts Casualty Insurance v. Johansen
270 So. 2d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Brailmont v. Goetz
240 So. 2d 818 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 So. 2d 842, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castellano-v-bader-bros-van-lines-inc-fladistctapp-1968.