Castellano-Mercado v. Garland
This text of Castellano-Mercado v. Garland (Castellano-Mercado v. Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 23-60356 Document: 00517040841 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/23/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-60356 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ January 23, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Nelson Ivan Castellano-Mercado, Clerk
Petitioner,
versus
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General,
Respondent. ______________________________
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A079 044 052 ______________________________
Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Nelson Ivan Castellano-Mercado, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions this court for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to remand and his second motion to reopen. With one exception for battered family members, which is inapplicable here, an alien may file only one motion to reopen. 8 U.S.C.
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-60356 Document: 00517040841 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/23/2024
No. 23-60356
§ 1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii), (c)(7)(A), (c)(7)(C)(iv); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii); see Djie v. Garland, 39 F.4th 280, 282–88 & n.2 (5th Cir. 2022). When, as is the case here, a motion to reopen is number-barred and the number bar is raised, the resulting petition for review should be denied. Djie, 39 F.4th at 287–88; see Maradia v. Garland, 18 F.4th 458, 462 n.6 (5th Cir. 2021). Castellano-Mercado fails to brief, and thus waives any challenge he may have had to, the denial of his motion for remand. Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8)(A); see Chambers v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 445, 448 n.1 (5th Cir. 2008). Consequently, insofar as Castellano-Mercado petitions for review of the denial of his second motion to reopen and his motion to remand, the petition is DENIED. See Djie, 39 F.4th at 287–88. The decision whether to reopen proceedings sua sponte is a discretionary one that this court lacks jurisdiction to review. Qorane v. Barr, 919 F.3d 904, 911–12 (5th Cir. 2019). Consequently, insofar as Castellano- Mercado petitions for review of the BIA’s decision not to reopen his proceedings sua sponte, the petition is DISMISSED. See id. DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Castellano-Mercado v. Garland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castellano-mercado-v-garland-ca5-2024.