Castellani & Cocoran v. Scranton Times, etal
This text of Castellani & Cocoran v. Scranton Times, etal (Castellani & Cocoran v. Scranton Times, etal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
RANDALL A. CASTELLANI AND JOSEPH : No. 477 MAL 2014 J. CORCORAN, : : Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Unpublished Memorandum and : Order of the Superior Court at No. 1145 v. : MDA 2012 exited June 10, 2014, : affirming, reversing and remanding : the Order of the Lackawanna County THE SCRANTON TIMES, L.P. T/D/B/A/ : Court of Common Pleas at No. 2005- THE SCRANTON TIMES AND THE : CV-69 exited March 23, 2012 TRIBUNE AND JENNIFER HENN, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The Superior Court’s decision is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED
to the Superior Court for further proceedings consistent with our decision in Castellani v.
Scranton Times, L.P., 124 A.3d 1229, 1231 (Pa. 2015).
Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Chief Justice Saylor filed a concurring statement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Castellani & Cocoran v. Scranton Times, etal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castellani-cocoran-v-scranton-times-etal-pa-2016.